Friday 25 March 2011

How has the internet changed your thinking?

EDGE Annual Question 2010 – How has the internet changed your thinking?

John Brockman presiding over an EDGE event at the Serpentine Gallery, London, in 2007


In January 2010,  über-impresario John Brockman posted the above question on his World Question Centre part of his Edge site. As usual, dozens of his regular respondents (Dawkins, Pinker, Eno, etc) answered with paragraph-length answers. It's a worthwhile browse....

Generally, opinions are divided between those who praise the internet because:
·         Web 2.0 interactivity: comments, feedback, dialogue not monologue
·         Knowledge to all, democratic, power to the people
·         Ideas spread fast
·         Instant access to vast amount of information (ultimate library)
·         Instant communication
·         Wiki collaborations
·      Luddites who reject the internet are frozen in time (intellectually speaking), perpetually before 1995 unless they read a lot of books, while the internet-savy accelerate

And those that suggest caution with regards to the internet
·         Wastes a lot of time (ephemeral news, distractions, digital deluge)
·         Need to unplug to have deep thoughts
·         Social inclusiveness can give a voice to all the crackpots, trolls & other scum
·         No substitute for face-to-face interactions
·         Anonymity breeds hate
·         Big Brother – government/corporations reading emails
·        No permanent record (emails deleted, online photographs only exist in a virtual intangible world).
·         Can’t outsource all your memory. Still need to know what to look up to get precise details on, in the same way that you roughly need to know how a word is spelt before trying to look up precisely how it’s spelt in the dictionary.

A book was published with all the responses for people who don't want to read long text on screen nor print out hundreds of pages.

Last year, I summarised some of the respondents' points in a WORD document which I'll copy-and-paste below. Some of the points may not make sense, as they are a summary-of-a-summary. With time, I'll tidy this up.



John Brockman
            Paper, writing – Externalise memory
            Internet – externalise senses, nervous system
            Hive mind – there’s only one mind, the mind we all share
            Collective externalised mind
Daniel Hills
            New era of Entanglement (compare with Enlightenment = independence).
Internet (TV, radio, FTP, www, twitter, email, Facebook) not same as the network
            Most people ignorant of the underlying infrastructure
Stewart Brand
            One surrounds oneself with a ‘guild’ of intellectual peers
            Moderate one’s thinking, cross-checking, error-correcting, etc
            A decades-long conversation
Clay Shirky
            Shock of Inclusion: professional media replaced by amateur media
            Average quality of thought has collapsed
            Influx of amateurs means that high-quality material needs different a production
            Invisible College / Republic of Letters – sharing.
            Now internet is the same thing on steroids.
Eric Fischl
            Experience replaced by facsimile
            The internet extends the pattern started by the camera & TV (e.g. social interactions)
Dawkins         
            The internet is a bottom-up network, grown organically
Fast interconnectedness blurs the distinction between a group of individuals and a society – so that the internet is creating a new ‘super-organism’, especially if instant (@ c) direct brain-to-brain communication were possible
Nassim Taleb
A small amount of addition information leads to a disproportionately larger increase in confidence so that we think we know more than we actually do
Unprecedented times: ignorance combined with hubris
Many fields have too low a signal-to-noise ration e.g. epidemiology, economics
Internet makes ‘runs on banks’ global i.e. more moody
To cull noise, need to go on an ‘internet diet’
We’re no wiser than our counterparts from centuries ago (loss aversion of Seneca)
Kevin Kelly
            Corpus collosum thicker in literates
            Brain affected by literature, which affects brain
            Currently no scientific studies of what the internet does to young brains
            Do we need to remember facts anymore?
            For every fact, there is an anti-fact (counter view-point)
            For every expert, an anti-expert (true or fraudulent)
            Certainty decreased – one now creates one’s own certainty
            Internet blurs the boundaries between work & play
George Dyson
            We used to be kayak builders but now are dugout builders
            Kayaks – built up from fragments
            Dugouts – removing wood from a trunk
            So much information, we have to sift through and discard it
Brian Eno
            The ‘Net didn’t free the world – the same tyrannical regimes still exist
                        Protest movements might be better organised but still ineffective
                        Western governments – can use internet as propaganda
            Undermining of truthworthiness
            Make one’s own collage (lack of independent objective authority)
            Eno now reads books more cursorily
            Community:
                        Used to mean physical/geographical connectedness
                        Now means shared interests of any arbitrary/banal hobbies
            Virtual life at the expense of First Life?
                        Authentic experience becomes more valuable
Mind is now more linguistic than visual (others experience this vice versa?)
            Expert
                        Used to be someone with access to special information
                        Now expert is someone with a better way to interpret
            Email
                        Check email several times a day
                        Resent having to answer loads of unsolicited e-mails
                        Interrupts thinking
            Artists/musicians
Used to do tours to promote their work (album – band)
                        Now need work to promote their tour
                        More effort needs to be put into aspects of a artwork that can’t be duplicated
                        The authentic has replaced the reproducible e.g. live concert
                                    This is the way it used to be before recordings and mass production
Chaos to our society if the internet collapsed
Marissa Mayer
            Internet allows better decision-making and more efficient use of time
            Still in its adolescence – not all the information is there yet
Martin Rees
Compare the episode of 3 Indian mathematicians in 2002 publishing a faster algorithm for factoring large numbers, with the ‘equivalent’ episode of Ramanujan writing a letter. In other words, today genius gets instantly valuated and recognised.
            Death of traditional journals
Andrian Kreye
            Internet is boring (in a good way), reducing need to commute, research into IT
            Unfulfilled predictions:
                        Timothy Leary – VR the next psychedelic
                        Todd Rundgren – rise of the amateur i.e. lots of mediocre creativity
            Thinking is faster
Philip Campbell
            Night-time ideas instantly acted upon
            Breadth of consideration, speed of access
            PubMed – biology database index of papers (soon superseded?)
Howard Rheingold
            Need skills of how to use the internet (discipline, research, critical thinking, etc)
            Internet literacy – attention, comprehension, filtering, etc
            Crap detection aka credibility assessment
Esther Dyson
            Immediacy – connections, answers, business, charity
            Empty calories – analogy to sugar
Larry Sanger
            Spread too thin? Unfocussed
            Flotsam on the fast-moving digital flood
            Should blame be external or internal? Need more self-discipline.
            Education curriculum that focuses on collaboration, social networks
            Rejection of the hive mind – prefers home schooling of children
George Church
            Hypertext and connection is what’s impressive, not knowledge
            Internet is not a separate intelligent entity – can’t solve problems, not self-aware
            Changes in the way we think more radical in the past: language, writing, brain size
            Still need to solve fuel, food, psychological & poverty problems
Lisa Randall
            No data as to whether internet is changing how we think. Anecdotes insufficient
            Not using a bookmark – forced to find the last text that can be remembered
            Is using the search function cheating? Get straight to the point – questions answered
Is a specific question is succinctly answered, do you remember it more than if it were spelled out in a long book, or just more efficiently (knowledge per unit of text).
Serendipity – can get unexpected surprises with traditional newspapers or online
Internet allows one to be bolder in areas one doesn’t know
Plural of anecdotes is not data – Frank Kotsonis
Can one draw new scientific conclusions from the anecdotes/data on the internet?
Gerd Gigerenzer
Center for Advanced Study in Palo Alto – technology initially barred to allow scholars to think deep thoughts
Rules: check email once a day, keep mobile off unless making a call
Writing – more of an impact. Exactitude
Concentration – may be a lost skill, as well memorisation
Internet – outsourcing cognitive abilities
Scott Atran
            Bottleneck 70kya – down to 2000 individuals (volcanic?)
            60kya – leaving Africa
            Global cooling & drying, parching of grasslands, less game
            Great Leap Forward i.e. cultural explosion of art & technologies
            Recursion – allows language to build complexity
                        Also facilitates theory of mind – I know that he knows the she knows
                        Genetic quirk that allowed recursion
            Claude Levi-Strauss – hot v cold cultures
                        Cold – static, eternal myths that ‘explain’, cyclical, no progress, oral memory
                        Hot – writing, agriculture, forward progress, dynamic
                                    Interchange via the Silk Road crossing Eurasia
            Exchange among societies
                        Promises between strangers, money, writing, contracts, laws
            AD0 – just 4 empires: Roman, Parthian, Kushan, Han (China & Korea)
            3 religions:       Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Hinduism (all interacted along Silk Road)
                                    Mutated into Christianity, Islam and Buddhism
            Concepts: individual free choice, collective humanity
            After the Enlightenment: secular religions e.g. “-isms” such as Fascism
            New forms of technology beyond the current internet:
                        Still bound by the old evolutionary psychology: traits since Palaeolithic times
                        Love, hate, jealousy, guilt, contempt, pride, loyalty, friendship, rivalry, risk
            Political freedom & diversity v dumbing homogeneity & deadening control
            Internet – double-edged sword – the oxygen of openness and of terrorism
            Globalisation – elites experience it differently from the itinerant underclasses
                        Driftwood: refugees, migrants, marginal e.g. Indian workers in Dubai
                        It can strengthen self-identity if set adrift among different cultures
Douglas Coupland
            Internet: too many celebrities, they all cancel each other out. Death of the megastar           Music collections no longer are static after age 23, but continue to grow, develop
Stephen Kosslyn
            Other people can serve as extensions of oneself
            Internet has extended memory, perception and judgment
            Can only write with a fact-checking browser in the background
            Filling up dead time (e.g. audiobooks while commuting), especially with smartphones
            Downside is dead time allowed deep thoughts (small price to pay?)
Kai Krause
Less of a feeling of isolation that conventional electronic media generates due to all the rubbish on TV. The internet allows connection with kindred spirits.
W Tecumseh Fitch
            Biological analogies to the internet:
                        Our nervous system evolved over 400 million years
                        Hormonal system (endocrine): hierarchical, master control cells
                                    Works fine for plants & fungi
                         Neuronal system – horizontal, for higher metazoans
                                    Organised into networks
                                    With spoken language, allows hunter-gatherer coordination

                        Writing: similar to endocrine system (e.g. edicts from kings, Papal bulls)
                        TV/Radio – top-down as well.
                        TCP/IP & HTML: equivalents of cAMP and neurotransmitters
                        Wikipedia & Google – hippocampus?
                        Youtube – occipital lobe?
           
                        Analogy falls down:
                                    Internet-as global brain isn’t in control of international power
                                    Political, economic, military ‘organs’ remain insulated from brain
 James O’Donnell
            When reading history, you realise how contingent everything was on accidents
                        Was the messenger delayed? Was there a miscommunication?
                        Delays are getting fewer – just seconds now, if fact. Essentially instant
Seth Lloyd
            About 0.5% of scientific statements on Wikipedia are incorrect
            Sex propagates useless information (junk DNA), now the internet does
            Life suffers editorial collapse (mass extinctions)
            So far editing the internet has not been necessary (cheap ram, ‘unlimited’ space)
If Moore’s Law continues we will run out of resources in which to hold, process all the information, then there will be a need for editing again.
Future projection – the ratio of useless to useful information will continue to grow
Serian Sumner
            Imagining life without the internet – empty, isolated, etc
            No consequences of actions on the net, with a cost in privacy
            Astonishing altruism – giving advice to strangers for hours.
            Portal to lazy escapism
Nicholas Christakis
            Skeptical that the internet changes the brain
            Books & telephony probably didn’t either
            Changing social interaction
            Most conversations: people talking about themselves
Intelligence evolved as a response to social complexity, not environmental challenges
            Aka ‘Social Brain Hypothesis’
Group size will remain at around 120-150 (can’t track more relationships)
            Military, education, Facebook groups, etc.
Neri Oxman
            Hypermnesia – exceptionally precise memory
                        Sufferers lack detail suppression, meta-analyses
                        Can’t induce, deduce, generalise, 1:1 scaling
                        e.g. Uruguay Funes – eventually driven mad (need dark room for refuge)
Alun Anderson
            Not changing thinking per se, but changing interactions
            Print  journalists, magazines, books – all likely to vanish
Extinction of books – a single isolated voice lacked authority, wisdom, breath
            Connecting the dots (using a security phrase) is the key
Impact of rock ‘n roll on the Soviet Union? Apocryphal. Impact of western permissive liberal culture on conservative cultures such as Iran, Saudi Arabia.
Albert-Laszlo Barabasi
            Internet = sixth sense
Lee Smolin
            Internet has altered the context in which we think & work
            Networks will be the new paradigm of thinking
            Synchronises & broadens global communities,
Tom McCarthy
            Reifies networks, logic of human thought that has always existed
John Markoff
            Pessimist – internet opens a Pandora’s Box of dystopian human nastiness
            Demise of localism
Just like intelligent well-to-do people have fewer people than poorer, less education people (blue state v red state), the forums are dominated by angry rabid extremists with a lot of time on their hands, while sensible rational people will be proportionally underrepresented in the debates.
            Every institution is dumbing down – tabloidization of media
Sam Harris
            Own thoughts are uploaded onto internet
            Just Google your memories: pictures, video, writings, sent folder, etc
            Memory is imperfect – tendency to almost always misremember
Peter Diamandis
            Twitter – meet up with friends anyway (iPhone app to see where they are)
            Answers – just ask ‘what is the answer to x’ and you shall receive
            Analogous to distributed computing – small time from others are put to use
Nick Bostrom
            Most important events in last 40 years: end of Cold War, and Internet (6 years)
            Dark energy, Human Genome, Guns Germs & Steel
            Internet allows contact with people one would normally never meet
            Prediction: VR (3D skype) will become more prevalent as a way to meet
                        Avatar motion capture technology – can meet in a virtual world
                        Almost like the ‘Holodeck’, but more like The Matrix
            Due to high transport costs of matter, compared to 0 costs of info transfer
            Disadvantages of transporting people”
                        Expensive, slow, jet lag in time zones, disruption, C footprint, security
            Gap between the virtual and the real will diminish – telephony, skype, second life
            It’ll be centuries before the full impact of the internet will be realised
                        After all look at electromagnetism, discovered in mid-19th century
David Myers
            Group Polarisation – tendency of face-to-face discussion to amplify opinions
            In the online world, like minded extremists ratchet each other up (echo chamber)
            Separation + conversation = polarisation
            Internet as social amplifier
            Social entrepreneurship: hearing aids as wireless speakers
Rudy Rucker
            Data, not algorithms, is what makes the modern inception of AI useful
            No intelligence – just an efficient search engine that mines the data
            Given enough data, can a computer ‘fake’ intelligence
            The anthill organises the data in a hierarchy (feedback) – no czar needed
Linda Stone
            More aware of the contract between online and offline world
            Real physical offline world: engages the senses – more appreciated now
Barry Smith
            Are the socially isolated internet-addicts part of a greater community?
            Internet exploits our desire for gossip (useful for tribes, but useless now)
Robert Shapiro
            Online data is more fragile than physical data (books), as drives can be deleted
Chris Dibona
            Search for maximum efficiency of communicating info: video? Audio? Text?
            Information pruning – resigned to not needing to know anything
            Nostalgia for making knowledge difficult (Puritanism, protestant work ethic)        
Andy Clark
            Internet is changing what you think, when you think, how you think
            Is it changing brains? Need more research. Armchair philosophers give all answers
            Rhetoric isn’t as highly regarded as it was 2300 years ago
Evgeny Morozov
            Emphasis on the present – real-time Web updated instantly.
            Countless status updates, ephemera,
            Good for advertisers to get snapshots of current real-time data
            Does it widen the gap between disengaged masses and engaged elites
            Cyber-lumpenproletariat – cybergames, gossip sites, xenophobic blogs, poking
            Giant online libraries – Google, etc.
            Issues of concern: gay marriage, marijuana or nuclear proliferation
Virginia Heffernan
            Internet is just another Symbolic System
            Does it map onto reality any better than other symbolic systems?
Sherry Turkle
            Teens need to learn that posting private info could haunt them for remainder of lives
They need a consequence-free moratorium
New McCarthyism? From employers, school, uni, etc
            Loopt – iPhone app that allows you to see where you friends are
Simon Baron-Cohen
            1000 hours/year on email alone (18,000 emails/year)
            Compare to Darwin’s 15,000 letters in a lifetime (much more meaningful)
            Percentage of time attending to email that is useful – about 10%
            Need to be strong in reducing time spent on email
Peter Schwartz
            Stanford – Well. Predecessor of Internet in 1980s
            Extension of the brain – all knowledge instantly
Jason Calacanis
            Web allows us to see all sides of debates, test theories, exposure to counter-evidence         Web allows us to be jury and investigators in crimes, etc
            Trust nothing, debate everything
Joshua Greene
            Books from before 1995 are still not outdated, so internet hasn’t changed that much
            Ask Jeeves – didn’t work. Internet can’t think
The internet doesn’t supply answers to search queries, it directs you to another human’s answers on the topic.
Marti Hearst
‘Social’ is the unexpected aspect of the internet – corrections, additions, opinions, alternatives, modifications, refutations, confirmations, comparisons, etc of everything posted
            News stories always using comments below the line as part of their news. Vox Pops
            Software/hardware support services are better than official providers’
Scott Sampson
            Internet = Great Source, Great Distractor
            Digital Natives: young people who know nothing else
            Possible effects on brains: fragmented knowledge, shorter attention spans
                        Reduction in reflection, introspection, in-depth thought
                        Terse communications, less face-to-face
                        Extinction of experience
            Video phones with skype – denies multitasking (unlike normal phones)
Still not real-time – unnatural delay
Low-resolution – missing subtle non-verbal communication
Not looking at camera but at screen – un-natural
How can we may telecommunication more meaningful?
            Children spent more time in VR world than in real world
                        Will they care about real world issues – climate change or species extinction?
Haim Harari
            It has to change our thinking – from fewer longer messages, to more frequent shorter
            Can you summarise all ideas into sound bites?
            Many messages are just links to longer blogs, commentary, opinions, reports
            Attention devoted to each message has to reduce
            It’s always ‘a bit more complicated than that’. Nuances are missing in summaries
            Scientific thinking not challenged by internet
            Political, social, economic thinking IS changed by internet
            Internet’s impact on teaching/learning could be substantial
                        Education methods have been slow to respond e.g. laptops in classrooms
Douglas Rushkoff
            Present tense – as if brain is now in a RAM drive, rather than hard drive
            Meanness – encourages resentfulness, short-fused, reactionary
            Sense of ‘obligation’ when responding to the masses
            Changed from ‘opt in’ to ‘opt out’
            Email devolved to SMS, blogs to tweets, drama into reality TV, films into thrill rides
            Adapting ourselves to the technologies, or adapting the technologies to us?
Terrence Sejnowski
            Youth has omnivorous appetite for new sensations
            Hijacking of dopamine neurons, etc.
            Extinction of old school luddite CEOs, teachers, journalists, etc.
Donald Hoffman
            Will the internet alter our fitness the same way that previous tools did? Arrows?
            Internet & epigenetics – parent/children interactions, gene expression, etc?
Thomas Metzinger
            Internet as cognitive prosthesis
            Addiction – no longer able to focus on old-fashioned serial symbolic info
            Attention management – new skill required
            Internet as emotional autoregulation – can dial-up anything
            Depersonalisation – loss of attention, lose of part of ‘self’
            New online environments – could lead to a weakly subjective state
                        Mixture of dreaming, dementia, intoxication, infantilisation
                        If we all do this – Public Dreaming
Gregory Paul
            Humans will really be redundant when AI develops networked superintelligences
Aubrey de Grey
            Likes the convenience of email but not mobile phones which interrupt
            Doesn’t like the instant/live aspects of today’s online world (tyranny)
Paul Kedrosky
            Must unplug to have big deep thoughts
            Too many cheap connections, a problem of scale
            Everyone experiences problems that formerly only celebrities experienced
Robert Provine
            Socially engaged simultaneous with being physically isolated
            Bluetooth headsets – walking and talking to the air
            18th century London – up to 6 deliveries per day
            Future internet – will be driven by smartphones, not computer terminals
Nigel Goldenfield
            Web changed his thinking since 2000 (interactive Web 2.0)
Altruism knows no bounds – create a Wiki page on a topic, write rubbish, and within days it’ll be completely corrected and updated
            In this way, the internet ‘talks back’ – the above is a another form of ‘search’
            This hack is academic discourse in fast-forward
            Human reflection of horizontal gene transfer
William Calvin
Speed is the essential difference with the internet – thoughts remain in working  memory for a lot longer, therefore one is able to make better associative connections
You can stand on the shoulders of a lot more giants a lot faster
Leo Chalupa
            Since emails can be leaked so easily, privacy is a concern. Have to be PC with email
            Serious thinking requires open honest communication
Mark Pagel
            Internet changes our thoughts, but not the way we think
            Internet is to our attention what sugar/fat is to our appetities
            Contagion, false beliefs, neuroses, conspiracy theories, narcissism
            Assumption of a small denominator (bottom half of equation)
                        Therefore just a few examples/samples for the numerator conclude a trend!
                        Risk assessment and decisions are thrown out
                        A tiny minority (but large in absolute number) can throw out intuition
Paul Saffo
            Samuel Johnson’s Two Kinds of Knowledge: what you know & where to get it
            Writing:           offloaded memory onto paper/tablet/papyrus
                                    democratised knowledge access
            Internet:          no longer need to know where to get it
                                    democratised knowledge finding
            Comparison with TV: channel surfing, mouse surfing – both can be wastelands
            Amuse ourselves to death – lack of discernment
Matt Ridley
50 dull-witted people who exchange & specialise can be smarter than 50 smart people who don’t exchange & specialise
                        Goethe – everyone knows everything
Frank Tipler
            Scientific knowledge becomes obsolete faster (print journals too expensive)
            Discoveries can be made by analysing raw data made online
            Pictures & videos by amateurs from JPL/ESA missions
Brian Knutson
            Internet has to change thinking due to so much time being on it
            Mesmerising – forgetting what the task was that one began with
            Disparity between present & future self (delayed gratification)
            Addiction: aka present-self bias
            Some need software that analyses, tracks their time, surfing, etc
Arnold Trehub
            Great for more frequent, deeper scientific conferences
David Eagleman
            Internet can save humanity
1.         Disease epidemics
2.         Availability of knowledge
3.         Speed by decentralisation: death of central media
4.         Minimisation of censorship
5.         Democratisation of education
6.         Energy savings
Samuel Barondes
            Neuroxing (akin to Xeroxing) – immediate, relevant
Tom Standage
            Sharpens memory by restoring lost information – can just search for it
            Internet great for older people (just like eyeglasses lengthened longevity of scribes)
            Spectacles: late 13th century (Marco Polo’s time)
John Tooby
            Galileo – God had also written a book of nature that anyone could investigate
                        No role for authority in evaluating it
Marcel Kinsbourne
            Internet in heaven – finally a way to waste infinite time
            Instant ratchetting everyone up at same time – progressing as fast as the cleverest
Nick Isaac
            Cattle – grazers. Consume large amounts of grass, undiscerning
                        Chews it a second time (regurgitates)
            Deer – browers. Only eat greenest shoots
                        Nimble, but no second digestion
Eva Wisten
            People realise many others have had the same thought before
Eric Weinstein
            Can you infer the internet from observing the real world?
                        Collapse in music stores, DVD sales, newspapers, etc
            New theorems in maths published on web, not in refereed journals
            Perhaps scientific achievements will be incremental, rather than revolutionary
Thomas Bass
            Sentences & thoughts are shorter. Pulses of thoughts e.g. TED
Helen Fisher
            Internet suited for social relationships – get to know someone before you meet them
                        It’s a return to ancestral days from the tribe, avoiding strangers
Lera Boroditsky
            Using a fork changes the brain, so the internet is going to as well
            London taxi driver study
            Eventually technologies become so ingrained we no longer notice them
                        e.g. numbers, writing, language
            Metaphors for explaining the mind: clay tablet, abacus, calculator, computer, network
            Internet as metaphor for the brain:
                        Billions of nodes communicating all sorts of mundane information
                        Only a few trend above the noise– that’s the conscious part
                        What is humanity conscious of: celebrities, superstition, amusements, etc?
Karl Sabbagh
            People even ignore their own books as it’s still easier to consult the Net
            Problem with books – facts are locked in, unable to be updated live
            It’s only a tool that does the same things as before, just faster & easier
Jon Kleinberg
            Web 2.0 much more human city than a library i.e. graffiti, noise, etc
            Information literacy
Alison Gopnik
            Similar impact to reading – lost in another world, anti-social
            Socrates warned against it (isolation, damage to dialog)
            Adults: web feels fragmented, splintered, discontinuous, but not for children
            New generation will adjust – great divide
Jesse Bering
            Globalisation + internet = Return of ancient Neolithic social psychology
            Reputation always with you – digital fingerprints everywhere
            Can’t reinvent yourself in another land as there is no other land
Janon Lanier
            Internet gripped by reality-denying ideology
            Notion of intellectual property destroyed – we all expect everything to be free
            How can parents be ‘live performers’, earning their living from touring?
                        Not compatible with neoteny i.e slow maturation process
                        Can’t be done by spouses due to Feminism
                        Can’t be done by socialism due to libertarianism
            Disjunction between adulthood and creative life
Keith Devlin
            Can’t answer the question re: internet until you define the question
            The way we make decisions – more options, customer feedback, reviews
            Wisdom of the crowds v elites (got us to this stage thus far)
            Customisability of the Internet – does it reflect human nature more than other systems
Daniel Haun
            Mistake repetition for truth (if the statement is repeated enough, it’ll be believed)
            You believe to be true what you hear most often or what can be recalled easiest
            Availability heuristic – what can recall easiest
            Google search engine – works by number of links i.e repetitions, not truth
            Internet resembles human thought
Michael Shermer
            Internet levels the playing field – democratises knowledge
            Elites can be shamed/humiliated/out-thought/disproved/’owned’ by lay people
            Extraneous factors becoming less important: degrees, family, wealth, fame, etc.
            Real power to non-privileged people
Lynn Margulis
            Global interactions between scientists, obscure information becomes accessible
Irene Pepperberg
            Vocal modulations missing in email
            Search functions aren’t always spot on (any non-Google search is weak)
            Must embrace positives while minimising negatives of the internet
Emanuel Derman
            Efficiency should be a means, not an end
            Internet is double-edged sword: more efficient for some tasks, but more distractions
Steven Pinker
            Pressure on pundits to pronounce ‘this changes everything’ about anything new
            Neophobia – wailing the decline of culture because youth are doing different things
            Thinking – often content is confused with process
            Multitasking – won’t be any major neural rewiring
            Myth – that students can’t write proper papers anymore
            We are changing the internet to us, not us to it e.g. GUI, feedback, gossip
Charles Seife
            Meta-memory e.g. bookmarks, favourites
            Meta-meta memory: search engines
            Spend a lot of time organising things so one can find them again
Joseph Ledoux
            Consolidation – conversion of short-term to long-term memory via protein synthesis
            Reconsolidation – retrieval of memory via protein synthesis, updating
                        Opportunity to include new information into the memory when retrieved
                        Latest research – reconsolidation can overwrite existing memories
            Your memory is only as good as the last retrieval
            The most accurate memories are the ones never remembered
Stanislas Dehaene
            Global collaborations can double the speed of a project – as one sleeps, another works
            Outsource to another timezone- work is done overnight
            The ‘problem’ always faces the sun
            Wikipedia is a bit like this – for free
            Paid work – third world computer outsourcing for small pay things that PCs can’t do
Anthony Aguirre
            Insights generally occur away from the internet
                        During interactive tasks or during ‘down-time’
            Speed of information thrown at you is too fast – no ‘down time’ for the brain
Powerful search – allows you to get straight to the crucial piece of info, but cuts out all the context and lead-up
            Pure crack cocaine (versus talks which are inefficient and allow reflection)
            Internet tempts many to go off the main thread
            No periods of mystery and pondering as we get to an answer instantly
            Better to think of the internet as a library
Richard Foreman
            Internet encourages idle drifting, not deep drilling
            Internet feeds smart people amphetamines & dumb people tranquilizers
Judith Rich Harris
            From too-little to too-much
Clifford Pickover
            Reliance on IPBs  i.e. Internet Aesthetic Brains
            Immortality – people in 100 years may still have access to what you wrote
Fiery Cushman
            Processing solution instead of memorising solution
            Ramifications for education – are teachers embracing or circumventing the ‘net?
            Changes behaviour
            London taxi drivers – can now use GPS
Geoffrey Miller
            Internet changes every aspect of thinking:
                        Perception, categorisation, attention, memory, spatial navigation, language
                        Imagination, creativity, problem-solving, theory of mind, judgment, decisions
            Internet is like a ‘sixth sense’
            Wikipedia – extended memory
            Facebook – Theory of Mind
            Decision-making – offload onto peers (feedback ratings), e.g. rotten tomatoes.
                        Wisdom of the masses (versus Roger Ebert saying Phantom Menace is great)
                        Ebay – online ratings system – very useful
                        Need to let go of academic/intellectual pretensions
                        Insulation from hucksterism of marketing, etc
            Moral lesson – one’s own thinking is not so different from the masses
Chris Anderson          
            Re-discovery of the spoken word, replacing print e.g. TED
            Return to pre-Gutenberg days – humans more attuned to listening than reading
            Good speakers can reach a mass audience, and incorporate video, text, audio, etc
                        Free advertising for authors, but only the ones who can speak well
                        Paid speaking appearances – artist as performer, not product maker
            Growing craving for live experience – ticket prices up, CD/book sales down
            Balance between talk being long enough to explain and short enough for masses
Christine Finn
            Evolution of internet from dial-up (privileged, expensive) to universal, always-on
Sue Blackmore
            One’s identity is larger online than one’s own self-identity
            Taken to its logical conclusion, strangers could know more about you than you do
            Much of the organisation of the information on the internet is done outside a brain
Sean Carroll
            Internet helps encourage honesty – as everyone can instantly fact-check you
            Instant correction – no one can get away with anything now
            Optimism – truth wins out
Ed Regis
            Academic specialisation of looking things up – now anyone can do the same thing
Giulio Boccaletti
            Internet as a platform for global collection awareness, action, discussions   
Andrew Lih
            Wikipedia defied all expectations
June Cohen
            Internet returns us to how we used to be. In other words, print changed us more
            Social media tools are new, behaviour comes naturally, as if it’s innate
            We adapt the tools to us
            If friends & family are globally dispersed, then social media allow world to shrink
Ian Gold
            Spectrum of friendship from genuine ones to complete strangers
            Double-edged sword – friends source of pain as well as pleasure
            Permanent record of temporary off-the-handle behaviour
            Large social groups means more free riders and deception, etc
            Robin Dunbar – social group size of 150 (villages, etc)
                        Constrained by time (16 hours), surplus resources, bell curves, etc
Steve Quartz
            Plato & Freud: divided mind into 3 parts
            Today: two parts for mental conflict (e.g. reason & emotion)
                        Automatic unconscious intuitive instinct v slower cognitive
                        Deliberate reflective cognition: standard for complex decision-making
            Recent research: unconscious processes better at solving complex problems
            Theoretical neuroscience: Pavlovian, Habit, Goal-Directed
                        Each capable of behavioural control
                        Confederacy of systems – 4 or 400? Don’t know
                        Manipulating representations via a mental logic/rules
            Modules: vision, memory, learning, problem-solving, decision-making
            Mysteries:
                        How neurons integrate signals
                        Code that neurons use to encode or transmit
                        Interaction within and between networks
                        Phenomenology of experience (consciousness) i.e. hard problem
            Introspection: too many experiments have revealed it to be flawed
Laurence Smith
            Less tolerant of own ignorant
            Is knowing lots of irrelevant stuff being ‘educated’
            Synthesise broad new ideas
Paul Ewald
            Can’t possibly be an expert on cancer in one lifetime – need 1000 years
            Statisticians, who can collate data, will be in demand
            Causes of cancer: random mutations versus infections
                        1970s: 1% of cancers caused by infections
                        2010: 20% of cancers caused by infections (& growing)
            Infections: do they increase mutation rate or remove barriers to cancer
                        Disabling programmed suicide, maximum cell divisions, etc
                        Like how the rabies virus changes the behaviour of the infected
            Human cancer viruses: spread by kissing, sex
Max Tegmark
            The call of the Sirens – ‘you have new mail’ sound
            Maintaining Zen-like focus easier in the past – need to disconnect from internet
            Internet eliminates the wasted lives in scientists REDISCOVERING the same things
                        Alexander Friedmann – expanding universe 1922
                        Georges Lemaitre – rediscovered 1927
                        Wallace would have beaten Darwin
            Don Martian had – get news from Al Jazeera, Fox, and everything inbetween
            Dangerous to have dwindling attention spans when problems are more complicated
                        Sound bites effective when the world has attention deficit disorder
            Harder to block truth (double-edged sword)
Roger Schank
                        Arguments about what is true (with simple facts) can be over quickly
                                    Although Truth-in-911, homeopathy, Freud, etc aren’t helped much
                        Elitism – smart people getting smarter (as they have critical thinking tools)
                                    Dumb people getting dumber because of all the nonsense on the ‘Net
                        Internet has changed the arbiters of truth
Timothy Taylor
            Allows longer work, in more places,
            Internet homogenises us – all plugged into the same paradigm
            Shared template for human thought
Neil Gershenfeld
            Interoperability – not optimal but still allows for unplanned synergies
            Scalability – protocols have allowed 6X increase in magnitude
                        Address size needed to be fixed i.e. TCP/IP IPv6 > v4
            End-to-end principle: what is connected to it that makes it important
            Open standards
Daniel Everett
            Access to fresh intellectual energy can invigorate one’s own research
Marc Hauser
Social media makes us ‘mind blind’ (social degeneracy)
Opposite extreme of holding hands while talking face to face
Deleted scene in Avatar – link two braids to each other
            Informavore
            One-click Amazon – click crack cocaine
Nicholas Carr
            Library without books – the future.
            Words on a computer screen contend with other stimuli for attention
Critical question is: is the content of novels so ‘deep’ that sustained deep concentration is warranted, so will a cursory cliff-notes summary be sufficient to achieve the same result, seeing as the benefit is more texts can be ingested in that way. Quantity over quality.
            Natural selection – future will favour those who can adapt to the Net’s noise
David Gelernter
            VR of the future will lead to emergent properties
            Slow-motion conversations: ratchetting each other up (highlight priority differences)
            Filter – simple bold succinct messages will propagate faster in attention-deprived ‘Net
Rodney Brooks
            Sugar for the mind – activating dopamine anticipation-reward system
            Collaborative mathematical theorems online e.g. Hales-Jewett theorem
            Problems to solve with online world:
                        Stability of pointers
                        Stability of formats (codecs still readable in the future)
                        Aggregate digital media into manipulable containers (audio, etc)
                        Business models – so people can still get paid
Paul Bloom
            Amazed that people give away their time voluntarily to correct mistakes
            Is the internet making us nicer, or is it just the same impulse to help someone
Howard Gardner
            Ideas of ownership/authorship are being renegotiated, undermined, rethought
            Older people live in two worlds – digital and non-digital
Daniel Dennett
            Absolute power corrupts absolutely. So we have absolute power with the internet.
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
            Less likely to sustain new lines of thought without checking first
            Superficial thought (decontextualised)
            Intrapersonal integrated thought
            Co-operative sites – transpersonal
            Like any technology, a double-edged sword
Yochai Benkler
            De-emphasising memory may ultimately change our thinking
            Tweeting – many tweets just disappear into the void, unread, unresponded to
Gary Marcus
            Let’s reboot our educational system from the 18th century model of memorisation
            Critical thinking skills and evidence-evaluation
            How to reason, reflect, plan, investigate, evaluate
            Only then can the internet change how we think
Ernst Poppel
            Thinking is a service function to create a homeostatic state or an internal equilibrium.
            Context (aka frame)
            Category – about some class of object
            Comparison – most basic mental operation
            Choice – decisions, action
            Causality
            Continuity
            Constellation – all together, eureka
Anton Zeilinger
            Need to write short emails, as people don’t read beyond Line #10
            Single issue emails
            Unexpected consequences of all this new social media technology
                        Like the laser, microchip, etc
Juan Enriquez
            Immortality – can upload large tracts of one’s life onto the web
            Entire Facebook, email, Twitter, Myspace, Flicker, etc histories
                        Add to this video, audio, etc
            Much better than the odd arrowhead that archaeologists have to interpret
Stefano Boeri
            Internet is wind – can walk against or with, needing resistance
Richard Saul Wurman
            The internet changes what you can think of – more options, new paradigms
            New virtual spaces to create in, explore, get lost in, reflect upon, etc.
Robert Sapolsky
            Wisdom of crowds – bottom up superior to experts (e.g. professional critics)
ebay feedback, rotten tomatoes, etc – more reliable
resembles bottom-up self-organising complexity
            Weirdos – how people have a craving to find others like themselves
                        The more unconventional, the greater to need to seek camaraderie
Emily Pronin
            People are unaware of the particular influences upon their thoughts
            We know what we think, but we don’t know why we think it
Why we think what we do: spawns an entire cottage industry of pseudo-intellectuals, self-help books, psychoanalysts, psychologists, theists.
            Internet could be influencing our thoughts in new, unknown ways
            Sometimes arbitrary the unexpected results Google throws up to searches
            Are you driving the machine, or is it driving you (perpetual feedback loop)
Galia Solomonoff
            Those born after 1980 – grew up from puberty onwards with computers
            No physical maps to remember old routes – everything is in real time
David Buss
            No more stigma to online dating services – like in the past, in classifieds
            Chances of finding compatible mates significantly improved
            Double-edged sword
            Positive or negative – can we settle when better prospects always available?
            Arms race of deception, counter-deception
            Internet markets of sugar-babies and sugar-dadies
            Internet hasn’t changed our fundamental nature –
there’s still the male emphasis on looks, female on status
Noga Arikha
            Internet born slowly, unfurling, developing limbs (1990-2000)
            Internet is adaptable, but also alienating
            Dependent, yet horrified by the dependence
            The need to leave the house getting less and less
            One day the generation will die out that knew life before the internet
Gloria Origgi
            What is ‘wasted time’?
            Resorting to tactics – switching off modem
            If academia is about being part of ‘the conversation’, then what’s wrong with email?
            Books can be full of noise too
            Dinner parties with stimulating participants – deemed not a waste
Victoria Stodden
Too much data: impossible to derive a deeper intellectual understanding than the mathematical framework of the tools of analysis are geared to uncover
            Today most computational results are not accompanied by their underlying code/data
Ian Wilmut
            Library of Alexandria, as well as Ephesus in Turkey and Sankure in Timbuktu
            Oldest lending library: Chetham’s in Manchester 1653
            Carnegie’s 1700 libraries
            Overturning the prohibition to teach slaves/peasants how to read/write
Still slow acceleration of progress – in other words, what were they scared of (same with the vote). In other words, institutions of authority (church, government) were once scared what would happen if the people could vote or read or be educated, but such is the innate desire to respect authority, they needn’t have worried. The electorate rarely likes to remove incumbents. Status quo is always easier as you’re used to it, especially with older people that can’t cope with change as well.
Jamshed Bharucha
            Minds synced up, coordinated, from all different backgrounds
            Risk of herding behaviour, groupthink
            Does truth always prevail in the end?
Matthew Ritchie
            Lots of inversion to sound different (arty, postmodern) – we don’t use the internet
                        It uses us
            CERN – invented WWW. Therefore CERN has already changed the world\
Jesse Dylan
            Only way to make advances was to have five 5 different strategies & hope 1 turns out
Mahzarin Banaji
            How you think comes from millions of years of evolution, not 15 years on ‘Net
            High volume data for online surveys e.g. morality (trolley problems, etc)
            Millions of participants
Tim O’Reilly
            Will the pace of the internet continue to accelerate?
            Already many are struggling to cope – if it continues another 15 years...
Frank Wilczek
The internet might evolve into the cloud or grid where all free CPU cycles are used for computation e.g. protein folding, solving equations for chemistry to find better materials e.g. high-temp superconductors, efficient photovoltaic cells, space elevators
Previous revolutions to come from quantum mechanics:
            fMRI imaging, lasers, materials, microprocessors, etc.
Chess hardware: beat masters 1978, grandmasters 1988, world champions 1997
World computer grid – could change our lives by giving us wonderful new materials
Eric Drexler
            Need new ways to detect what knowledge is missing from the web
            Improved absence-detection will lead to better decision-making
                        Development of knowledge
                        Validation of knowledge
                        Destruction of anti-knowledge i.e. discrediting false ideas
            Absence is the web, followed by absence in the world
            Each controversy has systematic for-and-against where opposing ideas are reconciled
                        Similar to Wikipedia
                        Single place to look
                        Climate change, health care, etc
David Dalrymple
            Filtering, not remembering is the most useful skill
Maintaining focus must be internally forced (knowledge external)
In the past, it was the opposite
            Each minute more gets added than one can read in a lifetime
            Having a memorised a large body of knowledge no longer important
            Irrelevance of geography
            100 years’ time: neural interface – what happens to our sense of identity?
Xeni Jardin
            Comforting to be online with in remote, exotic locales
            No end to a job – any text or work can always be updated in real time, corrected
Alan Alda
            Worries that what he just wrote could be misinterpreted
            Emails has no voice modulations
            Speed plus mobs – very hasty, no time for thoughthttp://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/bios/brockman.html

No comments:

Post a Comment